I would like to ask why Roseta 5.24 wanted to enter to some IP adress?
Kerio pers. firewall stopped it.

---

I would like to ask why Roseta 5.24 wanted to enter to some IP adress?
Kerio pers. firewall stopped it.

Normally the Rosetta application would not contact any web address. The BOINC application does all the communicating with outside websites. These are usually limited to scheduling new work, uploading results, and the links provided for the project in the BOINC manager window.

The Screen saver does use an internal network connection (loopback) when it runs.

To may knowledge that is all there is.

What address did BOINC attempt to contact?

---

Moderator9
ROSETTA@home FAQ
Moderator Contact

Problem is, that I didn't write it out....
But it has happened on 2 another computers in different networks.

---

Hi there i wonder if you could help me out?

Is there anyway i can get the team founder changed on my team(Scotland's Seti) as the team founder(Giles) isn't around anymore?
The founder member hasn't done any workunits for sometime and i would be quite happy to take on being the founder member as i am currently founder member on other projects, that of course is if its possible.

Best Regards

Snowdog

---

Going to post this now. But will not need the help for a little bit of time yet.
Would like to replace our Team Thread in the Team post. Can I get a moderator to work with on this. Just a simple repost of the newer team blurp.

---

Come Join us at Hawaiian Beach Bums

Hi,
I have found that the process rosetta_5.24_windows_intelx86 is trying to enter M$ IP adress 207.46.248.241 => msdl.microsoft.com
Why?

---

I have found that the process rosetta_5.24_windows_intelx86 is trying to enter M$ IP adress 207.46.248.241 => msdl.microsoft.com

I know MS have been helping the team with the Windows client. That url is for MS debugging tools? Perhaps it's connected with that? Just a guess.

---

Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.

Hello: I would like to draw your attention to a report of three WUs that have been sitting in my results account, long overdue, and errored out since early March. Thank you.

---

dag
--Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful.

Someone need to look at this thread https://boinc.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=1944, it looks like there are some participants with runaway credits. This need to be looked into asap, because it causing some unfair credits given out.

---

Electric Sheep is a free, open source screen saver run by thousands of people all over the world. It can be installed on any ordinary PC or Mac.
Electric Sheep

Hello,

I am using a mac osx 4.6, Boinc manager 5.2.13.

I just reacently noticed that rosetta does not stop computing after being suspended. I have to force quiting the rosetta program (the equivilant of going to task manager in windows). I do not have this problem with bioncsimap. I am not sure why this is? should i download a new version of boinc manager??

thanks

---

Is it not a deadline problem? If the deadline in too short BOINC enters in panic mode and crunch first the WUs with the closer date.

---

Is it not a deadline problem? If the deadline in too short BOINC enters in panic mode and crunch first the WUs with the closer date.

No, if you actually SUSPEND, then that's what BOINC should do.

Ilya, I saw your post, but don't have any experience with Mac. ...and had assumed Mod9 (who DOES have a Mac) would come and offer some info. But it seems Mod9 hasn't been around lately.

I did see issues like that with the older BOINC versions on Windows. I would suspend, the display would SAY it is suspended, and my task manager would show it is still crunching away. So, yes, upgrading BOINC would be a reasonable course. ...especially if you were on Windows :) I really have no idea is similar issues arose on Mac.

---

Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/

Why don't I read post carrefuly? 'Suspended' was the key word of course.

Should I report WU's that cannot be completed? I put Rosetta on my son's gaming PC, but he removed it after completing 4 WU's, with two in process.

WU's 24670641 & 24646923

---

Should I report WU's that cannot be completed? I put Rosetta on my son's gaming PC, but he removed it after completing 4 WU's, with two in process.

Not necessary to report this, the BOINC server at Rosetta will notice they failed to come back, and if necessary, will send them out to someone else.

but he removed it

... and the law says we can't spank them, damn liberals!

---

Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.

Please will you remove the old message in team recruiting for UK BOINC Team?

this one https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=986#11265 the person who posted this is no longer in the team and I wish to place an updated message in (well I have added the updated message now)

and also one of my old posts from when I was in a different team

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=986#9965

---

Join us in Chat (see the forum) Click the Sig


Join UBT

There is a hole in the process for the new work credit. A workunit failure at https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=33613027 shows the failure of the work unit. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=29132098 shows that it was not captured by the new work unit crediting system.

dag

---

dag
--Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful.

Beach Bum:

Going to post this now. But will not need the help for a little bit of time yet.
Would like to replace our Team Thread in the Team post. Can I get a moderator to work with on this. Just a simple repost of the newer team blurp.

Sorry it's taken so long to get around to this. Please go ahead and make your new post in the team thread, and add an update here as a reminder to remove your previous post in that thread.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Mod.Tymbrimi

I'll go clean things up a bit.

Oh - very impressive way to handle situation. Deleting Johns offence and my plus another moderator responce to it. But leaving in tact all the garbage directed against me posted by Sangamon Taylor and Phoenix. Like they were not explained that it was not my choice and not my intention to post under Administrator name.

John seemed under the impression that you chose the name "Administrator" for ulterior motives to present your opinions of the other projects.

But you know that this impression is plain wrong - it was explained to you, John, his team members and anyone else dozen times. And not only by me but by other participants and Mod.DE

You posted your opinions about other projects as "facts".

Oh, I state my opinion and always tried back it with what I know. If someone disagree - he can post his opinion and explain why he think so. That what forums are about.

Those that have run those projects may see your opinions stated as "facts" as offensive.

This sounds really confusing to me. You use that expression second time. What do you mean by saying opinions stated as "facts"? I'm expressing my opinion the best way I can, if someone disagree he always welcome to critique me and back his point. I never said something "whatever I wrote here is final facts and not to be discussed further". Or what do you mean?

You don't have to insult someone directly when insulting the project they run.

It is and never was my intention to insult anyone. Being sceptical about worthwhileness of some another projects is my right, and yes, I back my point whenever possible - not trying just "insult projects" for the sake of insulting. Read for example my last post there.

---